WHY YOU NEED TO VOTE “YES” March 10
by Chris Van Vechten
So back in October I alerted readers that the School Board was in the process of organizing a capital improvement bond. I endorsed the effort back then, and continue to do so today because – while I agree that taxes do suck – they make more sense then printing off stimulus checks. More importantly, there’s an old saying that money is like manure: it’s no good to anyone until its spread around, and in this case the benefits of our district’s impending fiscal fertilizer are obvious.
WHAT THE BOND DOES
Raises property taxes by $0.75 per $1000 of assessed property to generate enough revenue to raise a $300 million bond that would immediately be put to work modernizing or updating some of our district’s oldest schools whilst concurrently addressing smaller projects like leaky roofs and worn playground equipment that – if neglected – could ultimately cost the district more in repairs. The bond will also be used to implement more energy-efficient heating, cooling, lighting and ventilation systems which – in the long run – will save the tax-payer money.
BANG FOR BUCK AND JOBS
As Superintendent Jarvis pointed out, during times of economic decline Government often becomes the chief provider of jobs. With unemployment on the rise and the construction industry going into a slow decline, the School Board has a golden opportunity to put its tax dollars to work by reinvesting them back into the community from which they were gleaned. Simultaneously, as School Board president Jim Dugan pointed out, the decreasing demand for construction jobs in Pierce County will result in lower bids from willing contractors. EVERYBODY WINS
BUT WHY DO I HAVE TO PAY FOR IT
Because, contrary to what Harry Reid might say about us having a “voluntary tax system”, the truth of the matter is that a national crisis requires a national sacrifice. More importantly, the quality of a community’s public school system is usually the single most important factor in said community’s financial success. Good schools attract wealthy/entrepreneurial residents who provide jobs and generate tax revenue. Bad schools encourage what used to be called “white-flight” (what I call “the middle-class mambo”) to more prosperous communities or a surge in private school enrollment. This leads to an decline in property values (hurting the home-owners who depend on the equity of his/her home) and an influx of social cancers we in Tacoma need not be reminded of.
Naturally, tax exemptions are available for low-income homeowners, qualifying senior citizens and disabled persons. Also, EVERYONE SHOULD BE CHALLENGING THEIR PROPERTY TAXES THIS YEAR. In 2007, roughly half of those who challenged their assessments through official appeals won reductions of about 10%. Many used the National Tax Payers Union’s “How To Fight Property Taxes” as a guide.[1] Even though we are now subject to the tyranny of Dale Washam, we should all be challenging our property assessments given the current state of the economy.
VOTING – DIDN’T WE JUST DO THAT
Exactly, which is why I’m really concerned about low turn-out, especially considering that – unlike a school levy (thanks in part to The Melon and the WEA’s Simple Majority Campaign) – at least 60% of the voters must approve the bond for it to pass. So vote, and vote yes.
HOW CAN I HELP
Call the Tacoma Education Association and tell them you wanna volunteer for change…again.
Personally, I find initiatives, bonds and levies a lot more satisfying to volunteer for than politicians. It’s an opportunity to promote an idea, rather than merely an individual, and that’s what makes it such a powerful experience.
SO GET INVOLVED….especially if your an educator, student or parent.



February 22nd, 2009 at 7:51 am
To get involved directly, you could also contact Tacoma Citizens for Schools (the official school bond campaign) at tacomacitizens@gmail.com, or donate to the campaign via the website: http://www.tacomacitizens.org
Reply
February 24th, 2009 at 1:43 pm
I have a partial beef with this bond. Instead of forcing home owners to pay, shouldn’t all city residents pay? Why not use a sales tax instead of a property tax?
I rent, and because I rent, I’ll be exempt from paying a cent to help our school system out (unless the owner raises my rent, in which case I’ll be pissed). I think a lot of similar situations are concurrent with mine (although I tried Googling how many landowners vs. renters are in Tacoma, I could not find the proper statistic).
Who came up with the idea to do a property tax increase, and why property tax?
Reply
Rachel King Reply:
February 24th, 2009 at 6:39 pm
@Jen Drake,
It’s my understanding that, if you’re paying taxes, you are paying some to help the school system. Some funding for schools come from property taxes, others come from “state aid”–other tax money allocated for the schools. (Someone please correct me if I’m wrong.) I think the logic behind the property tax money going toward the schools is that people who own a house in an area usually have a long-term interest in the area, so they should contribute toward the schools whereas apartment dwellers are more transient and don’t necessarily have a vested local interest. Maybe more of school money should come from sales tax or “state aid” and less from property tax–I haven’t yet thought this through.
Reply
February 24th, 2009 at 1:46 pm
p.s. Digged your manure analogy.
Reply
February 25th, 2009 at 11:15 am
Yeah, I think it’s been done that way because it’s always been done that way. Because real estate is fixed in a place, it’s easy to assign a cost for sa chool located near that place to that piece of property. Of course, that doesn’t mean it’s necessarily the best way to go about it now, but to change it would require some legislative and/or constitutional changes. I think it would be hard to find a state legislator who wants their name attached to a big sales tax hike for public education.
Personally, I’d be happy to fund schools differently because the tie to property tax rates is what triggers the election requirement to have a tax raise. Which is expensive and annoying.
Here’s a little historic piece about property taxes, for what it’s worth:
http://eh.net/encyclopedia/article/fisher.property.tax.history.us
Reply